Britannica Explains In these videos, Britannica explains a variety of topics and answers frequently asked questions.and some guys too (although they might have been cynical)! While the scene as it is, didn't excite me and influenced my vote directly, the impact it has/had, does reflect in my vote, as well as the fact, that the target audience seems to love it. There is one "special" scene that really made them happy.
Again though, as with the first one, this was aimed at a female audience group and if you saw it in theaters, than you might have heard quite a few of them screaming. The problem being, it isn't at all! And while there are a few nice action pieces, the whole thing feels utterly ridiculous, which makes it quite hard to really enjoy it. While nothing much is happening (not only acting wise), the movie still tries to be as dramatic as it can be. But that's more due to the movie "Up in the Air" than to her role in this one. And the girl who played in "Up in the Air", forgot her name. And I think the only one coming out of, mostly unscathed, is Taylor Lautner. The acting wasn't really top notch from part 1. But while some additional stuff has been made up (or so I've been told), that wasn't in the book, to have a "special" character with more screen time, this all adds up to a pretty dreadful experience. Stewarts character (Bella) has to go through, come across. well if you thought that, than you are very wrong!! The things K. While we had our introductions in the first movie (and I'm assuming you have either seen that or at least read the book), we should be able to have more "fun" with the characters this time around. I've heard that, the first movie (Twilight) didn't bring everything from the book onto the screen (which makes sense, because otherwise the source material would've been really slim/weak). First of all, I haven't read the novels/books, so I can't say how close this is to the source material.
0 kommentar(er)
